AlphaFold 2 initial-guess (binder interface) remote tool#
TOU validation and deployment status (2026-08-16)#
af2ig — the
af2_initial_guessstep of nrbennet/dl_binder_design at commitcafa3853, AlphaFold 2model_1_ptmre-predicting a designed binder–target complex from the complex itself as the structural initial guess — ran on the NVIDIA GB10 (aarch64, cc 12.1, driver 580.173.02) under the optimization kit’soffmode. Read what this is before reading anything else: “ig” is INITIAL GUESS, the input is a STRUCTURE and not a sequence, and the number it exists to produce ispae_interaction(angstroms; the field’s working threshold is below 10). All fivetu remote setupsteps are green and the acceptance suite passed: an ascending ladder, a mixed-shape phase, four consecutive identical requests, and a separate clean-worker run at the row the budget is declared on — an ascending ladder of 100 / 200 / 400 residues, a mixed-shape phase, four consecutive identical requests, a separate clean-worker run at 800 residues (the row the budget is declared on), and a two-rebuild engine test. 29 held-worker requests, 29 structures, 0 failures, every one asserted to have written a*_af2pred.pdb. THERE ARE NO PADDING BUCKETS HERE, which is the opposite of AlphaFold 3 and changes which half of the test carries the evidence: this model compiles one XLA program per exact total residue count, so four identical requests exercise one program and the shape change is the whole test. Residency is worth 26x at its best rung and 1.7x at the row the budget is declared on – 95.0 s cold against 3.6 s held at 100 residues, and 272.1 s against ~163 s at 800. Plan with the second number; the first is the best case, and it is largest where a request is cheapest. Declared budget 6.0 GiB at 800 residues, which is also the tool’s input ceiling; the ladder is 0.5 / 1.0 / 2.0 / 6.0 GiB at 100 / 200 / 400 / 800 residues (reported), over a working set of 0.49 / 0.62 / 1.23 / 4.36 GiB (actual). Two cautions below are specific to this provider: its VRAM figure is quantised in a way a torch provider’s is not, and its environment carries one named deviation from the kit’s lock (tensorflowfortensorflow-cpu, because no aarch64 wheel of the latter exists). Public publication, cross-user isolation, concurrency, recovery and scientific quality are untested; keep this deployment private.
Operation:
af2ig_predictStart:
python -m tooluniverse.remote.af2ig.af2ig_toolEndpoint:
http://127.0.0.1:8053/mcpProvider configuration: this provider is on the remote-tool standard, so the model runs in its own environment built from a pinned lock, and the weights are declared with a size and a sha256 and verified before the worker starts. Keep provider data, weights, caches and credentials outside Git. Use one worker: the resident worker serves one request at a time by design, and a second in-flight request queues on its lock rather than doubling peak VRAM. The measured VRAM budget is 6.0 GiB; read the envelope it was measured at in the manifest before co-tenanting anything else on the card, because a larger request exceeds it.
TOU check:
tu doctor --forward http://127.0.0.1:8053/mcp --jsonPrivate relay:
tu serve --share --forward http://127.0.0.1:8053/mcp --name validation-af2ig --workers 1
Non-loopback binding requires TOOLUNIVERSE_API_TOKEN; otherwise keep the
server on loopback. The relay requires TOOLUNIVERSE_SERVICE_KEY. Public
publication and independent-caller testing were not run.
New-user check: python scripts/remote_validation/setup_skill_preflight.py --implementation af2ig. Add --check-provider-env before launch, --live
after launch, and --check-connect-prereqs before sharing. Live preflight
checks exact MCP discovery only; it does not run or validate a model.
The authenticated 2026-08-16 Platform matrix found all 30 private owner relays
online and all 41 operations discoverable. It imported each implementation as
unpublished owner draft(s), configured a 120-second timeout, and invoked it
through /expert-sessions/{id}/test. This implementation was added after
that matrix and was not part of it, so none of that evidence covers it: it has
not been exercised through the Platform at all, and everything above was
measured locally, on one card, through the loopback endpoint. Public
publication, independent-caller authorization/isolation, broad saturation and
persistent supervision are unvalidated here.
Overview#
AlphaFold 2 initial-guess re-prediction of a designed binder-target complex (nrbennet/dl_binder_design, model_1_ptm): takes the complex as a PDB, returns the predicted complex plus the interface confidence scores (pae_interaction, plddt_binder, RMSDs). No MSA is built and no external service is contacted.
Weights and kit are pinned: src/tooluniverse/remote/af2ig/provider.toml
declares the upstream kit by commit, the environment by lock file, and every
weight file with its byte count and digest. Nothing is fetched at request time.
The measured peak VRAM for this host is written to
~/.cache/tooluniverse/measured/af2ig.json, and that per-host file – not the
number in the manifest – is what a scheduler should read.